Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change

This page summarizes what the two most relevant authorities -- NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) and the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) -- actually say about the connection between tropical cyclones and human-caused climate change, and links to the primary sources rather than asking you to take our word for it. It closes with a bibliography of Ryan Maue's and Roger Pielke Jr.'s own peer-reviewed work in this area.

Daily BriefingTropical Cyclones of 2026 to DateUpdated 2026-07-22 · PNGClimate BriefingTropical Cyclones and Climate ChangeJuly 2026 edition · PNG

Key Takeaways

Global ACE, 1980–present

This site's own data, for reference against the literature below: global Accumulated Cyclone Energy by season, and ACE per hurricane by season (total ACE divided by that season's global hurricane count) — a rough proxy for whether individual storms are getting more energetic, independent of how many form in a given year.

ACE by season, 1980–2026

Global, 1980-present · full-history season totals

ACE05001000150019801990200020102020

ACE per hurricane by season, 1980–2026

Global, 1980-present · full-history season totals

ACE/hurricane051015202519801990200020102020

A longer view, back to 1966, smoothed into 24-month running totals rather than discrete seasons — useful for seeing multi-year active/quiet stretches that a single season's bar can obscure:

24-month running-sum global and Northern/Southern Hemisphere ACE, 1966-present

30-Year ACE Density Climatology

Where, geographically, does that energy actually accumulate? Every eligible best-track fix's ACE is spread along its storm's track, gridded, and averaged over a trailing 30-year window — an areal density (per 104 km2) independent of grid size, so basins with very different areas are directly comparable. The Northwest Pacific and Eastern Pacific (off Mexico) stand out as the two most energetic corridors on Earth in both eras below.

Global 30-year mean annual ACE density climatology, 1996-2025

NOAA/GFDL

GFDL's Global Warming and Hurricanes page (last revised November 2024) is the most-cited single summary of the physical-science consensus. Its key points:

IPCC AR6 WG1, Chapter 11: detection and attribution

Chapter 11 ("Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate") is the IPCC's primary assessment of observed and attributed trends. Its tropical cyclone section (11.7) assigns a specific confidence level to each claim -- worth reading precisely rather than as a single up-or-down verdict:

The Summary for Policymakers frames the overall detection picture more cautiously than any single bullet above: "event attribution studies and physical understanding indicate that human-induced climate change increases heavy precipitation associated with tropical cyclones (high confidence), but data limitations inhibit clear detection of past trends on the global scale" (SPM, section A.3).

For the 21st century, Chapter 11 projects:

IPCC AR6 WG1, Chapter 12: time of emergence

Chapter 12 ("Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment") addresses a different question than Chapter 11: not just whether a trend exists, but whether a human-caused signal has emerged -- or is projected to emerge -- from the background of natural year-to-year and decade-to-decade variability. This is the "time of emergence" (ToE) concept, synthesized across dozens of climate impact-drivers in the chapter's Table 12.12, which color-codes each driver by whether a signal has emerged already, is projected to emerge by 2050 or by 2100 under a high-emissions scenario (RCP8.5), or is not expected to emerge in that table's assessment window at all.

Tropical cyclones fall into that last category: no emerged signal to date, and none of the table's projected-emergence categories reached, even out to 2100 under RCP8.5. That is a separate, and more conservative, statement than Chapter 11's trend findings above -- a likely increase in Category 3-5 proportion over four decades (Ch. 11) is a detected trend; it is not the same claim as a signal having emerged from natural variability with enough confidence to be classified in Chapter 12's synthesis. Roger has written a longer, plain-language walkthrough of Table 12.12 and what "emergence" does and doesn't mean: "What the IPCC Actually Says About Extreme Weather."

Chapter 12 also carries its own forward-looking projection, consistent with Chapter 11's:"Tropical cyclones are expected to increase in intensity despite a decrease in frequency in most tropical regions (medium confidence)" (12.4).

Historical Data Recovery

A methodological note relevant to any long-term trend claim above: the South Indian, North Indian, and South Pacific basins weren't formally within JTWC's area of responsibility until 1985, so a JTWC-only record understates pre-1985 activity in exactly those basins. This site recovers that missing energy by merging in the NCAR ds824 (through 1980) and C. Neumann (through 2007) archives storm-by-storm, taking whichever source reports the highest eligible wind at each fix — see Methodology for the full method.

Extra ACE recovered per year by merging ds824/Neumann into the JTWC record, 1945-2007

Societal Context: Normalized Hurricane Damages

While trends in the physical characteristics of tropical cyclones are often modest or uncertain, economic losses from hurricanes in the United States have risen sharply in recent decades. Research by Pielke and colleagues demonstrates that these increases are driven overwhelmingly by societal change rather than by any change in storm frequency or intensity.

The update cited above (Weinkle et al. 2018, Nature Sustainability — see Bibliography below) normalized U.S. hurricane damage from 1900–2017 to 2018 societal conditions (accounting for population growth, wealth, and development). Key findings:

For context, that same study normalizes the 1926 Great Miami hurricane at roughly $236 billion (2017 dollars) — the single costliest storm in the 1900–2017 record once normalized, ahead of Katrina (2005) or Harvey (2017) at the time of the study.

Related peer-reviewed work in the bibliography below (including Klotzbach et al. 2018 and Weinkle et al. 2012) reaches similar conclusions: rising reported damages reflect increased exposure and wealth along the coast, not a climate-driven increase in storm activity.

Bibliography: Maue & Pielke Jr.

Peer-reviewed work by Ryan Maue and/or Roger Pielke Jr. relevant to tropical cyclones, climate, and economic loss, newest first:

  1. Weinkle, J., Landsea, C., Collins, D., Musulin, R., Crompton, R. P., Klotzbach, P. J., & Pielke Jr., R., 2018: Normalized hurricane damage in the continental United States 1900–2017. Nature Sustainability, 1, 808–813. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0165-2
  2. Klotzbach, P., Bowen, S., Pielke Jr., R., & Bell, M., 2018: Continental United States hurricane landfall frequency and associated damage: observations and future risks.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0184.1
  3. Mohleji, S., & Pielke Jr., R., 2014: Reconciliation of trends in global and regional economic losses from weather events: 1980–2008. Natural Hazards Review, 15, 1–9.
  4. Weinkle, J., Maue, R., & Pielke Jr., R., 2012: Historical Global Tropical Cyclone Landfalls. Journal of Climate, 25(13), 4729–4735. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00719.1 -- the methodology this site's own landfall counts follow; see Methodology.
  5. Crompton, R. P., Pielke Jr., R. A., & McAneney, K. J., 2011: Emergence timescales for detection of anthropogenic climate change in US tropical cyclone loss data.Environmental Research Letters, 6, 014003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014003
  6. Maue, R. N., 2011: Recent historically low global tropical cyclone activity.Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L14803. doi:10.1029/2011GL047711
  7. Pielke Jr., R. A., 2009: United States hurricane landfalls and damages: Can one- to five-year predictions beat climatology? Environmental Hazards, 8(3), 187–200.
  8. Pielke Jr., R. A., Gratz, J., Landsea, C. W., Collins, D., Saunders, M. A., & Musulin, R., 2008: Normalized Hurricane Damage in the United States: 1900–2005.Natural Hazards Review, 9(1), 29–42.
  9. Pielke Jr., R. A., 2007: Future economic damage from tropical cyclones: sensitivities to societal and climate changes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365, 2717–2729.
  10. Pielke Jr., R. A., 2005: Are there trends in hurricane destruction?Nature, 438, E11. doi:10.1038/nature04426
  11. Pielke Jr., R. A., & Landsea, C. W., 1998: Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1925–95. Weather and Forecasting, 13(3), 621–631.
  12. Pielke Jr., R. A., & Pielke Sr., R. A., 1997: Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society. John Wiley & Sons, 279 pp.

See also About for Ryan's and Roger's current writing, and Methodology for how this site's own data is built.